AI can assist the review. The educator makes the decision.
Examifo uses configured expectations and rubrics to propose grading results, flags uncertain work, and preserves educator approval or correction.
Free plan available · No payment card required- Create
- Deliver
- Evaluate
- Understand
Written assessment deserves accountable automation
A generated score should never become unquestioned truth. Useful AI assistance must expose its proposal, confidence, reasoning signals, and need for manual review.
Purpose-built assessment capabilities.
Structured proposals
Receive proposed marks and feedback against educator-provided expectations.
Uncertainty flags
Route lower-confidence or exceptional responses to manual review.
Human override
Approve or replace a proposal while retaining an auditable workflow.
A review-first workflow
Keep the assessment’s questions, rules, responses, and results connected from beginning to end.
- 1
Provide the expected answer, key points, or rubric context.
- 2
Let Examifo evaluate eligible submitted responses.
- 3
Review confidence, feedback, and flags before accepting.
- 4
Approve or override the proposal and finalize the result.
Automation supports the decision. It does not replace accountability.
Examifo keeps configurable rules, AI-assisted proposals, proctoring signals, and final grading decisions visible to the educator. Institutions remain responsible for appropriate assessment design, participant notice, consent, and review.
Reduce repetitive review without surrendering judgment.
Try the assessment demo and explore how different response types are evaluated.